Featured research
The 2026 attack-chain anatomy: how 3 lows became 1 critical.
An anonymized walkthrough of a real engagement where chained low-severity findings produced a full tenant-isolation bypass.
14 MIN READTHREAT RESEARCHAPR 2026
Practical writing from our consultants — threat research, guides, sample artifacts. No marketing fluff. No fear-mongering. Just what we've learned testing real systems.
Our consultants spend a tenth of their week writing about what they've learned. The goal isn't lead-gen — it's making the next engagement, ours or somebody else's, sharper.
Browse all insights →Most security firms ship findings that engineers can't action and reports that auditors don't trust. We do the opposite: depth that reads like code review, evidence that survives scrutiny.
A finding without a reproduction, a severity rationale, and a fix path is just a ticket. We ship findings the way good engineers ship features — with context, tests, and a path to ship-ready code.
Scanner output dressed up as analysis is the industry's worst habit. Every finding we publish has been reproduced by a human, mapped to a real attack path, and reviewed by a senior consultant before it leaves our environment.
Diff-ready remediation. Standards-mapped evidence (OWASP, MITRE, SOC 2, ISO, HIPAA, PCI). Free retest within 90 days. Strict data isolation — your test data never trains a shared model.
Static and dynamic application security testing — finding flaws in source vs. running code.
Insecure Direct Object Reference — when an authenticated user accesses data they shouldn't.
A standard awareness document representing the most critical web-app risks.
A knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques observed in the real world.
An auditing procedure for service organizations against five Trust Services Criteria.
A class of attacks where untrusted input subverts the instructions of an LLM.
If something here lines up with what you're shipping, we'd love to talk.